CAMDEN — From Napster to iTunes to Pandora, the methods by
which the public can obtain and share music have rapidly progressed.
Future groundbreaking innovations may need to wait,
though, as the next generation of technology is being stymied by the very
copyright laws that seek to protect the industry, says Michael Carrier, a
professor of law at Rutgers–Camden.
“There is not enough attention being given to the effect
copyright law has on innovation,” Carrier says about the fight against
copyright infringement and the attempt to extinguish every instance of piracy.
For his new article, “Copyright and Innovation: The Untold
Story,” to be published in the University
of Wisconsin Law Review this fall, Carrier interviewed more than 30 CEOs
and other top-level executives from the recording industry, technology
companies, and venture capital firms to determine the relationship between
copyright law and innovation.
working on revolutionary technologies and many venture capitalists told me that
copyright law has harmed innovation in the music industry,” Carrier says.
Carrier says it’s impossible to say exactly which
innovations have experienced roadblocks because they never publicly surfaced,
“But industry leaders made clear to me that there are numerous innovations that
failed to reach the market because of copyright laws,” he says.
In his research, funded by a Google Research Award
received last year, Carrier points to Napster as the first instance of a
peer-to-peer service being liable for violating the copyright laws. Users of
the service were able to share music digitally, but questions of copyright infringement surrounded the
company and court rulings forced it to cease operations. It is now owned by
After the Napster decision, Carrier says, “a lot of
innovators were scared away from trying to work with the record labels.”
Carrier also says the decision was a setback for digital
music technology and services like Spotify and Pandora, which could have been
developed years ago.
Attention to copyright and innovation issues increased in
early 2012, when thousands of internet sites participated in a “blackout”
protest against two controversial anti-piracy laws that would have punished
websites that host pirated content.
Due to widespread public protests, the Stop Online Piracy
Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA) were ultimately pulled off the table.
“The laws presented examples of copyright holders trying
to expand the law to protect themselves at the expense of everybody else,”
Carrier says. “We saw that the technology and internet communities have muscles
to flex. Innovation needs to be part of the equation. I wrote this article to
help put innovation at the forefront of the debate.”
the article to the Social Science Research Network in July, where it became the
no. 1 downloaded article and was downloaded 3,000 times in one week.
also generated coverage from Billboard magazine, the New York Times blog, and more than 50 music, arts, law, and
technology websites around the world.
A Philadelphia resident, Carrier is the author of Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property
and Antitrust Law (Oxford University Press, 2009). He is a
co-director of the Rutgers Institute for Information Policy and Law and teaches courses in intellectual property,
antitrust, and property law at the Rutgers School of Law–Camden.
Media Contact: Ed Moorhouse